Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 159.0GB/s)
3856 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 's Advantages
Lower TDP (204W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 FURY X +1114%
8.602 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 285
0.708 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2015
Release Date
Dec 2008
Pirate Islands
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1242 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
512bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
159.0GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
4096
Shading Units
240
256
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

67.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.74 GPixel/s
268.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.84 GTexel/s
8.602 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.602 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
708.5 GFLOPS
537.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
88.56 GFLOPS

Board Design

275W
TDP
204W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
GT200B
Fiji XT C8 (215-0862040)
GPU Variant
G200-350-B3
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.3
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy