AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER

VS

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X and 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 's Advantages

Lower TDP (275W vs 285W)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER 's Advantages

Released 8 years and 7 months late

Boost Clock2610MHz

More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.3GB/s vs 512.0GB/s)

4352 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

Radeon R9 FURY X

8.602 TFLOPS

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER +412%

44.1 TFLOPS

3DMark Time Spy

Radeon R9 FURY X

5173

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER +368%

24253

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2160p

Radeon R9 FURY X

30

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER +286%

116

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1440p

Radeon R9 FURY X

65

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER +238%

220

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1080p

Radeon R9 FURY X

80

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER +272%

298

Radeon R9 FURY X

VS

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER

Graphics Card

Jun 2015

Release Date

Jan 2024

Pirate Islands

Generation

GeForce 40

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 3.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-

Base Clock

2340 MHz

-

Boost Clock

2610 MHz

500 MHz

Memory Clock

1313 MHz

Memory

4GB

Memory Size

16GB

HBM

Memory Type

GDDR6X

4096bit

Memory Bus

256bit

512.0GB/s

Bandwidth

672.3GB/s

Render Config

64

Compute Units

-

SM Count

66

4096

Shading Units

8448

256

TMUs

264

64

ROPs

96

-

Tensor Cores

264

-

RT Cores

66

16 KB (per CU)

L1 Cache

128 KB (per SM)

2 MB

L2 Cache

48 MB

-

Theoretical Performance

67.20 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

250.6 GPixel/s

268.8 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

689.0 GTexel/s

8.602 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

44.10 TFLOPS

8.602 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

44.10 TFLOPS

537.6 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

689.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

275W

TDP

285W

600 W

Suggested PSU

600 W

1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2

Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a

2x 8-pin

Power Connectors

1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

Fiji

GPU Name

AD103

Fiji XT C8 (215-0862040)

GPU Variant

AD103-275-A1

GCN 3.0

Architecture

Ada Lovelace

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

28 nm

Process Size

5 nm

8.9 billion

Transistors

45.9 billion

596 mm²

Die Size

379 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

2.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.2

Vulkan

1.3

-

CUDA

8.9

6.3

Shader Model

6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

1

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs ATI FireMV 2260 PCIe x1

2

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega II

3

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs ATI Radeon HD 4570 Rebrand

4

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB

5

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD Radeon R5 230

6

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs ATI Radeon HD 2400

7

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD Radeon R5 220 OEM

8

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 12 GB GA104

9

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA L20

10

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2

Related News

1

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

2

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

3

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

4

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

5

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

6

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU

7

Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!

8

Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game

9

World's First! Intel Arc B580 Graphics Card Arrives Early

10

Linux Creator Criticizes AMD and Intel's x86 Microarchitecture: A Complete Disaster