Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA T400

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA T400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X and 2GB VRAM T400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
3712 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA T400 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1425MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 FURY X +686%
8.602 TFLOPS
T400
1.094 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2015
Release Date
May 2021
Pirate Islands
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
420 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1425 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
4096
Shading Units
384
256
TMUs
24
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

67.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.80 GPixel/s
268.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.20 GTexel/s
8.602 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
2.189 TFLOPS
8.602 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1094 GFLOPS
537.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
34.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

275W
TDP
30W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
TU117
Fiji XT C8 (215-0862040)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.3
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy