Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 FURY X2 vs ATI FireGL V3600

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X2 vs ATI FireGL V3600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X2 and 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
3976 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 FURY X2 +5873%
8.602 TFLOPS
FireGL V3600
0.144 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jun 2007
Pirate Islands
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM
Memory Type
DDR2
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
64
Compute Units
3
4096
Shading Units
120
256
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

67.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
268.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
8.602 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
144.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Capsaicin
GPU Name
RV630
Capsaicin XT C9
GPU Variant
RV630 GL
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
73W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.2.170
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.5
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy