Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M265X vs AMD FirePro W4190M

AMD Radeon R9 M265X vs AMD FirePro W4190M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M265X and 2GB VRAM FirePro W4190M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M265X 's Advantages
256 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W4190M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 44% (900MHz vs 625MHz)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M265X +15%
0.8 TFLOPS
FirePro W4190M
0.691 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2014
Release Date
Nov 2015
Gem System
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

575 MHz
Base Clock
825 MHz
625 MHz
Boost Clock
900 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
384
40
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.200 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
800.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
691.2 GFLOPS
50.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Venus
GPU Name
Opal
Venus PRO (216-0846009)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
-
-
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy