Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M265X vs AMD Radeon Pro W6300M

AMD Radeon R9 M265X vs AMD Radeon Pro W6300M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M265X and 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6300M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6300M 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 226% (2040MHz vs 625MHz)
128 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M265X
0.8 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6300M +291%
3.133 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2014
Release Date
Jan 2022
Gem System
Generation
Radeon Pro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

575 MHz
Base Clock
1512 MHz
625 MHz
Boost Clock
2040 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
32bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
768
40
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
12
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.28 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
97.92 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.267 TFLOPS
800.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.133 TFLOPS
50.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
195.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
25W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Venus
GPU Name
Navi 24
Venus PRO (216-0846009)
GPU Variant
Navi 24
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
2.2
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy