Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition vs AMD FirePro M8900

AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition vs AMD FirePro M8900

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition and 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock975MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
64 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro M8900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition +52%
1.997 TFLOPS
FirePro M8900
1.306 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2014
Release Date
Apr 2011
Crystal System
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

850 MHz
Base Clock
-
975 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

16
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
960
64
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

31.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.76 GPixel/s
62.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.64 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.997 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1306 GFLOPS
124.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

80W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
Blackcomb
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GPU Variant
Blackcomb XT GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
1.7 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy