Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition vs AMD FirePro W4190M

AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition vs AMD FirePro W4190M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition and 2GB VRAM FirePro W4190M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 8% (975MHz vs 900MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W4190M 's Advantages
Released 1 years late

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition +189%
1.997 TFLOPS
FirePro W4190M
0.691 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2014
Release Date
Nov 2015
Crystal System
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

850 MHz
Base Clock
825 MHz
975 MHz
Boost Clock
900 MHz
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
16
Compute Units
6
1024
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

31.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.200 GPixel/s
62.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.997 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
691.2 GFLOPS
124.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.20 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
Opal
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Board Design

80W
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy