Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce MX230

AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce MX230

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX230 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce MX230 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 57% (1531MHz vs 975MHz)
Lower TDP (10W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition +154%
1.997 TFLOPS
GeForce MX230
0.784 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2014
Release Date
Feb 2019
Crystal System
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

850 MHz
Base Clock
1519 MHz
975 MHz
Boost Clock
1531 MHz
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
48.06GB/s

Render Config

16
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
1024
Shading Units
256
64
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

31.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
24.50 GPixel/s
62.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.50 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.25 GFLOPS
1.997 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
783.9 GFLOPS
124.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
24.50 GFLOPS

Board Design

80W
TDP
10W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
GP108
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GPU Variant
N17S-G0-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
1.8 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy