Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition vs AMD FirePro M7820

AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition vs AMD FirePro M7820

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M7820 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.3GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1248 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro M7820 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition +210%
3.482 TFLOPS
FirePro M7820
1.12 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2014
Release Date
May 2010
Crystal System
Generation
FirePro Mobility
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1362 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
174.3GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
800
128
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

27.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.20 GPixel/s
108.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.00 GTexel/s
3.482 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.482 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1120 GFLOPS
217.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Amethyst
GPU Name
Broadway
Amethyst XT
GPU Variant
Broadway XT GL
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5 billion
Transistors
1.04 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
166 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy