Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs AMD FirePro W5130M

AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs AMD FirePro W5130M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition and 2GB VRAM FirePro W5130M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W5130M 's Advantages
Boost Clock925MHz

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition +215%
2.989 TFLOPS
FirePro W5130M
0.947 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Oct 2015
Crystal System
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
925 MHz
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
512
112
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.69 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.80 GPixel/s
93.41 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
29.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.989 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
947.2 GFLOPS
373.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Amethyst
GPU Name
Tropo
Amethyst PRO (216-0872004)
GPU Variant
Tropo LE
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy