Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Max-Q

AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Max-Q

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition and 12GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4080 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1350MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 174.7GB/s)
5632 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition
2.989 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4080 Max Q +570%
20.04 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Jan 2023
Crystal System
Generation
GeForce 40 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
795 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1350 MHz
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
58
28
Compute Units
-
1792
Shading Units
7424
112
TMUs
232
32
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
232
-
RT Cores
58
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
48 MB

Theoretical Performance

26.69 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.0 GPixel/s
93.41 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
313.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
20.04 TFLOPS
2.989 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
20.04 TFLOPS
373.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
313.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Amethyst
GPU Name
AD104
Amethyst PRO (216-0872004)
GPU Variant
GN21-X9
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
4 nm
5 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
295 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
60W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.3
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy