Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon HD 6650A

AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon HD 6650A

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition and 1024MB VRAM Radeon HD 6650A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1312 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon HD 6650A 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition +418%
2.989 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 6650A
0.576 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Apr 2011
Crystal System
Generation
All-In-One
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
28
Compute Units
6
1792
Shading Units
480
112
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

26.69 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.800 GPixel/s
93.41 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
14.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.989 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
576.0 GFLOPS
373.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Amethyst
GPU Name
Onega
Amethyst PRO (216-0872004)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
45W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy