Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile

AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (65W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition +115%
2.989 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile
1.385 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Jul 2019
Crystal System
Generation
Radeon Pro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
28
Compute Units
10
1792
Shading Units
640
112
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

26.69 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.31 GPixel/s
93.41 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.62 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1385 GFLOPS
2.989 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1385 GFLOPS
373.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
86.56 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Amethyst
GPU Name
Polaris 23
Amethyst PRO (216-0872004)
GPU Variant
Polaris 23 XT GLM
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
5 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
65W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy