Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56

AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega 56 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1250MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (402.4GB/s vs 174.7GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (210W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition
2.989 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Vega 56 +199%
8.96 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Aug 2017
Crystal System
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1138 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1250 MHz
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
786 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
402.4GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
56
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
3584
112
TMUs
224
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.69 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
80.00 GPixel/s
93.41 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
280.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
17.92 TFLOPS
2.989 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.960 TFLOPS
373.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
560.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
210W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Amethyst
GPU Name
Vega 10
Amethyst PRO (216-0872004)
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XL (215-0894216)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
5 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy