Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon R5 M240 Rebrand

AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon R5 M240 Rebrand

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R5 M240 Rebrand to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R5 M240 Rebrand 's Advantages
Boost Clock700MHz

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition +455%
2.989 TFLOPS
Radeon R5 M240 Rebrand
0.538 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Jan 2014
Crystal System
Generation
Crystal System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
650 MHz
-
Boost Clock
700 MHz
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
384
112
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.69 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.600 GPixel/s
93.41 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.80 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.989 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
537.6 GFLOPS
373.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
33.60 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Amethyst
GPU Name
Mars
Amethyst PRO (216-0872004)
GPU Variant
Mars LE
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy