Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon R7 A260

AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon R7 A260

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 A260 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 A260 's Advantages
Boost Clock980MHz

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition +297%
2.989 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 A260
0.752 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Jan 2014
Crystal System
Generation
All-In-One
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
980 MHz
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
384
112
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.69 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.840 GPixel/s
93.41 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.52 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.989 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
752.6 GFLOPS
373.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Amethyst
GPU Name
Topaz
Amethyst PRO (216-0872004)
GPU Variant
Topaz XT (216-0858020)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5 billion
Transistors
1.55 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
125 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy