Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs AMD FirePro M2000

AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs AMD FirePro M2000

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
1568 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro M2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (33W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition +675%
3.723 TFLOPS
FirePro M2000
0.48 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Jul 2012
Crystal System
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
32
Compute Units
6
2048
Shading Units
480
128
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

29.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.000 GPixel/s
116.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.00 GTexel/s
3.723 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.723 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
480.0 GFLOPS
232.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Amethyst
GPU Name
Turks
Amethyst XT
GPU Variant
Turks GL
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
33W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy