Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile

AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition 's Advantages
1024 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1515MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 174.7GB/s)
Lower TDP (50W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition +19%
3.723 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
3.103 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Apr 2020
Crystal System
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1380 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1515 MHz
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
2048
Shading Units
1024
128
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
48.48 GPixel/s
116.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.96 GTexel/s
3.723 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.205 TFLOPS
3.723 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.103 TFLOPS
232.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
96.96 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Amethyst
GPU Name
TU117
Amethyst XT
GPU Variant
N18P-G61-MP2
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
5 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.3
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy