Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20

AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega 20 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition 's Advantages
768 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1283MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (189.4GB/s vs 174.7GB/s)
Lower TDP (100W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition +13%
3.723 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Vega 20
3.284 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Nov 2018
Crystal System
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
815 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1283 MHz
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
740 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
1024bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
189.4GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
1280
128
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
41.06 GPixel/s
116.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
102.6 GTexel/s
3.723 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.569 TFLOPS
3.723 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.284 TFLOPS
232.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
205.3 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
100W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Amethyst
GPU Name
Vega 12
Amethyst XT
GPU Variant
Vega 12 XTA
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
5 billion
Transistors
Unknown
366 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy