Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon Pro W5300M

AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon Pro W5300M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W5300M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition 's Advantages
768 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro W5300M 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1250MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 174.7GB/s)
Lower TDP (85W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition +16%
3.723 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W5300M
3.2 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Nov 2019
Crystal System
Generation
Radeon Pro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1250 MHz
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
1280
128
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.00 GPixel/s
116.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
100.0 GTexel/s
3.723 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.400 TFLOPS
3.723 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.200 TFLOPS
232.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
85W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Amethyst
GPU Name
Navi 14
Amethyst XT
GPU Variant
Navi 14 PRO XLM
GCN 3.0
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
5 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy