CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
VS
AMD Radeon R9 Nano
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 7 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
4056 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 175W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 Nano
+25500%
8.192 TFLOPS
FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
0.032 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 Nano
VS
FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Jan 2009
Pirate Islands
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM
Memory Type
DDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
64
Compute Units
2
4096
Shading Units
40
256
TMUs
4
64
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
256.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.192 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
512.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
Fiji
GPU Name
RV620
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
GPU Variant
RC620 PRO
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²
Board Design
175W
TDP
32W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x VHDCI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
4.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce G100 OEM
2
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs ATI Radeon HD 3850 X3
3
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 X2
4
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 PCIe x1
5
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation
6
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
7
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon Pro V520
8
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB
9
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon R7 250E
10
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 PCIe x1
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy