Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs ATI Radeon HD 4250

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs ATI Radeon HD 4250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 4250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 6.336GB/s)
4056 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 4250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 175W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 Nano +16966%
8.192 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 4250
0.048 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Feb 2009
Pirate Islands
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
396 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM
Memory Type
DDR2
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.336GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
40
256
TMUs
4
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.376 GPixel/s
256.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.376 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.192 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
47.52 GFLOPS
512.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

175W
TDP
25W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
RV620
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
GPU Variant
RV620 LE
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy