CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD FirePro W8100
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD FirePro W8100
VS
AMD Radeon R9 Nano
AMD FirePro W8100
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 8GB VRAM FirePro W8100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (175W vs 220W)
AMD FirePro W8100 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 Nano
+94%
8.192 TFLOPS
FirePro W8100
4.219 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 Nano
VS
FirePro W8100
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Jun 2014
Pirate Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
512bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s
Render Config
64
Compute Units
40
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
2560
256
TMUs
160
64
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.74 GPixel/s
256.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
131.8 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.192 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.219 TFLOPS
512.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.109 TFLOPS
Board Design
175W
TDP
220W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Fiji
GPU Name
Hawaii
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL40
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.3
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 620
2
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
3
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102
4
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM
5
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA P106 100
6
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon R7 250XE
7
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon R7 370
8
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
9
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260
10
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs ATI Radeon HD 4350
Related News
1
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
2
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
3
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
4
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
5
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
6
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
7
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
8
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
9
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
10
Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy