Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 140 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
4032 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 175W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 Nano +3838%
8.192 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 140 OEM
0.208 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Mar 2009
Pirate Islands
Generation
GeForce 100
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
8
4096
Shading Units
64
256
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.40 GPixel/s
256.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.80 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.192 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
208.0 GFLOPS
512.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

175W
TDP
105W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
G94B
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
196 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.3
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy