CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 GM206
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 GM206
VS
AMD Radeon R9 Nano
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 GM206
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 GM206 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 GM206 's Advantages
Boost Clock1239MHz
Lower TDP (60W vs 175W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 Nano
+545%
8.192 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 750 GM206
1.269 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 Nano
VS
GeForce GTX 750 GM206
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Nov 2015
Pirate Islands
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1087 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1239 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
64
Compute Units
-
4096
Shading Units
512
256
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.65 GPixel/s
256.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.65 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.192 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1269 GFLOPS
512.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
39.65 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Fiji
GPU Name
GM206
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²
Board Design
175W
TDP
60W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
6.3
Shader Model
6.4
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs ATI Radeon HD 3850 X3
2
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce G100 OEM
3
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 PCIe x1
4
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 X2
5
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD FireStream 9270
6
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD FirePro W2100
7
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo
8
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs ATI FireGL V5600
9
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs ATI FireGL V8650
10
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon HD 6790
Related News
1
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
2
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
3
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
4
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
5
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
6
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
7
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
8
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
9
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
10
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy