Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 GM206

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 GM206

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 GM206 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 GM206 's Advantages
Boost Clock1239MHz
Lower TDP (60W vs 175W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 Nano +545%
8.192 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 750 GM206
1.269 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Nov 2015
Pirate Islands
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1087 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1239 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
64
Compute Units
-
4096
Shading Units
512
256
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.65 GPixel/s
256.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.65 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.192 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1269 GFLOPS
512.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
39.65 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
GM206
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Board Design

175W
TDP
60W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
6.3
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy