CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
Categories
English
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
Polski
日本語
한국어
Türkçe
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
Polski
日本語
한국어
Türkçe
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal
VS
AMD Radeon R9 Nano
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 12GB VRAM TITAN X Pascal to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 480.4GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (175W vs 250W)
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
Boost Clock1531MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 Nano
8.192 TFLOPS
TITAN X Pascal
+33%
10.97 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Radeon R9 Nano
4677
TITAN X Pascal
+110%
9844
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Radeon R9 Nano
2191
TITAN X Pascal
+119%
4812
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2160p
Radeon R9 Nano
28
TITAN X Pascal
+50%
42
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1440p
Radeon R9 Nano
60
TITAN X Pascal
+30%
78
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1080p
Radeon R9 Nano
75
TITAN X Pascal
+70%
128
AMD Radeon R9 Nano
VS
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Aug 2016
Pirate Islands
Generation
GeForce 10
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1417 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1531 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1251 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
12GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR5X
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
480.4GB/s
Render Config
64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
28
4096
Shading Units
3584
256
TMUs
224
64
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
147.0 GPixel/s
256.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
342.9 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
171.5 GFLOPS
8.192 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.97 TFLOPS
512.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
342.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
175W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Fiji
GPU Name
GP102
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
GPU Variant
GP102-400-A1
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
11.8 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
471 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.3
Shader Model
6.4
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon HD 6290
3
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs ATI Radeon HD 5570
4
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM
5
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
6
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs ATI Radeon HD 5490
7
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation
8
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
9
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon 540
10
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
Related News
1
NVIDIA Plans to Launch Next-Generation Rubin Accelerators in September
2
AMD Unveils New Zen5 Processor
3
TSMC Completes Trial Production of 2nm Process with an Impressive 90% Yield
4
Intel Confirms Nova Lake Processors, Adopting 14A Process Technology
5
NVIDIA is Preparing to Launch a Gaming Laptop APU Equivalent to the 4070
6
Is the AMD Ryzen 9000G Desktop CPU Coming Soon the Final Zen 5 Release?
7
Leaked Benchmark Data for AMD RX 9060XT Shows It Underperforming Compared to 5060Ti
8
Intel Launches the All-New Core Ultra 200 Series Processors
9
Intel Unveils Three New Xeon 6 Processors
10
AMD Officially Launches the Zen5 Series Threadripper
© 2025 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy