Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (175W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 Nano +43%
8.192 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
5.728 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Apr 2017
Pirate Islands
Generation
Radeon Pro GCN
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
36
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
2304
256
TMUs
144
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.78 GPixel/s
256.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.0 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.728 TFLOPS
8.192 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.728 TFLOPS
512.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
358.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

175W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
Ellesmere
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
GPU Variant
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy