Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon PRO W7700

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon PRO W7700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 16GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (175W vs 190W)
AMD Radeon PRO W7700 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock2600MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 512.0GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 Nano
8.192 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7700 +290%
31.95 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Nov 2023
Pirate Islands
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2600 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
64
Compute Units
48
4096
Shading Units
3072
256
TMUs
192
64
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
48
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
249.6 GPixel/s
256.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
499.2 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
63.90 TFLOPS
8.192 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
31.95 TFLOPS
512.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
998.4 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
Navi 32
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
GPU Variant
Navi 32
GCN 3.0
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
28.1 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
346 mm²

Board Design

175W
TDP
190W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.1
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy