Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon R7 240

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon R7 240

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
3776 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 240 's Advantages
Boost Clock780MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 175W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 Nano +1541%
8.192 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 240
0.499 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Oct 2013
Pirate Islands
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
730 MHz
-
Boost Clock
780 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM
Memory Type
DDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
320
256
TMUs
20
64
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.240 GPixel/s
256.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.192 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
499.2 GFLOPS
512.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

175W
TDP
30W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
Oland
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
GPU Variant
Oland PRO (215-0837015)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy