CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon R9 280X2
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon R9 280X2
VS
AMD Radeon R9 Nano
AMD Radeon R9 280X2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 288.0GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (175W vs 375W)
AMD Radeon R9 280X2 's Advantages
Boost Clock1000MHz
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 Nano
+100%
8.192 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 280X2
4.096 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 Nano
VS
Radeon R9 280X2
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Unknown
Pirate Islands
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
950 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
3GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
64
Compute Units
32
4096
Shading Units
2048
256
TMUs
128
64
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
Theoretical Performance
64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
32.00 GPixel/s
256.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.192 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
512.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1024 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Fiji
GPU Name
Tahiti
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
GPU Variant
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²
Board Design
175W
TDP
375W
450 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
3x 8-pin
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce G100 OEM
2
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 PCIe x1
3
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 X2
4
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs ATI Radeon HD 3850 X3
5
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2
6
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD FirePro W2100
7
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo
8
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
9
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 OEM
10
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT
Related News
1
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
2
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
3
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
4
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
5
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
6
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
7
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
8
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
9
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
10
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy