Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon R9 280X2

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon R9 280X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 288.0GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (175W vs 375W)
AMD Radeon R9 280X2 's Advantages
Boost Clock1000MHz

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 Nano +100%
8.192 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 280X2
4.096 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Unknown
Pirate Islands
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
950 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
3GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
64
Compute Units
32
4096
Shading Units
2048
256
TMUs
128
64
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
32.00 GPixel/s
256.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.192 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
512.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1024 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
Tahiti
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
GPU Variant
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Board Design

175W
TDP
375W
450 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
3x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy