AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT

VS

AMD Radeon R9 Nano AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX 6650 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages

Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 280.3GB/s)

2048 additional rendering cores

Lower TDP (175W vs 176W)

AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT 's Advantages

Released 6 years and 9 months late

Boost Clock2635MHz

More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

Radeon R9 Nano

8.192 TFLOPS

Radeon RX 6650 XT +31%

10.79 TFLOPS

3DMark Time Spy

Radeon R9 Nano

4607

Radeon RX 6650 XT +114%

9897

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2160p

Radeon R9 Nano

28

Radeon RX 6650 XT +35%

38

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1440p

Radeon R9 Nano

60

Radeon RX 6650 XT +28%

77

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1080p

Radeon R9 Nano

75

Radeon RX 6650 XT +58%

119

Radeon R9 Nano

VS

Radeon RX 6650 XT

Graphics Card

Aug 2015

Release Date

May 2022

Pirate Islands

Generation

Navi II

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 3.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-

Base Clock

2055 MHz

-

Boost Clock

2635 MHz

500 MHz

Memory Clock

2190 MHz

Memory

4GB

Memory Size

8GB

HBM

Memory Type

GDDR6

4096bit

Memory Bus

128bit

512.0GB/s

Bandwidth

280.3GB/s

Render Config

-

SM Count

-

64

Compute Units

32

4096

Shading Units

2048

256

TMUs

128

64

ROPs

64

-

Tensor Cores

-

RT Cores

32

16 KB (per CU)

L1 Cache

128 KB per Array

2 MB

L2 Cache

2 MB

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

168.6 GPixel/s

256.0 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

337.3 GTexel/s

8.192 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

21.59 TFLOPS

8.192 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

10.79 TFLOPS

512.0 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

674.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Fiji

GPU Name

Navi 23

Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)

GPU Variant

Navi 23 KXT (215-130000136)

GCN 3.0

Architecture

RDNA 2.0

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

28 nm

Process Size

7 nm

8.9 billion

Transistors

11.06 billion

596 mm²

Die Size

237 mm²

Board Design

175W

TDP

176W

450 W

Suggested PSU

450 W

1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2

Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a

1x 8-pin

Power Connectors

1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

2.0

OpenCL

2.1

1.2

Vulkan

1.3

-

CUDA

-

6.3

Shader Model

6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

2

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs ATI Radeon HD 4870 Mac Edition

3

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM

4

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

5

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 56

6

AMD Radeon RX 5500 OEM vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

7

AMD Radeon HD 7470 OEM vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

8

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs ATI Radeon X1950 PRO DUAL

9

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce 210 Rev. 2

10

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA RTX A5000-8Q

Related News

1

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

2

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

3

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

4

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

5

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

6

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

7

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD

8

NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance

9

Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports

10

Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip