Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 460 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

AMD Radeon RX 460 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon RX 460 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 460 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
680 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 460 +301%
2.15 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2016
Release Date
Sep 2008
Arctic Islands
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1090 MHz
Base Clock
-
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

14
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
27
896
Shading Units
216
56
TMUs
72
16
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
67.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
2.150 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
134.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
182W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0b 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Baffin
GPU Name
GT200
Baffin PRO
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
65 nm
3 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy