Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 460 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100

AMD Radeon RX 460 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon RX 460 and 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 2100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 460 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 48.00GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 2% (1219MHz vs 1200MHz)
Lower TDP (35W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 460 +72%
2.15 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 2100
1.248 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2016
Release Date
Jun 2017
Arctic Islands
Generation
Radeon Pro Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1090 MHz
Base Clock
925 MHz
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
48.00GB/s

Render Config

14
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
896
Shading Units
512
56
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.50 GPixel/s
67.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.01 GTexel/s
2.150 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
1248 GFLOPS
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1248 GFLOPS
134.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
78.02 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
35W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0b 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Baffin
GPU Name
Lexa
Baffin PRO
GPU Variant
Lexa PRO GL
GCN 4.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
14 nm
Process Size
14 nm
3 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy