Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 560 XT vs ATI FirePro V4900

AMD Radeon RX 560 XT vs ATI FirePro V4900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 560 XT and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 560 XT 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1226MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1312 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V4900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 560 XT +472%
4.394 TFLOPS
FirePro V4900
0.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2019
Release Date
Nov 2011
Polaris
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1074 MHz
Base Clock
-
1226 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
480
112
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

39.23 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.400 GPixel/s
137.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
4.394 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.394 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
274.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

150W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Ellesmere
GPU Name
Turks
Polaris 10 LE1
GPU Variant
Turks XT GL
GCN 4.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy