Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 590 GME vs AMD FirePro S7150

AMD Radeon RX 590 GME vs AMD FirePro S7150

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon RX 590 GME and 8GB VRAM FirePro S7150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 590 GME 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1420MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro S7150 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 175W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 590 GME +73%
6.543 TFLOPS
FirePro S7150
3.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2020
Release Date
Feb 2016
Polaris
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1257 MHz
Base Clock
-
1420 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

36
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
2048
144
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

45.44 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.44 GPixel/s
204.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
117.8 GTexel/s
6.543 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
7.537 TFLOPS
6.543 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.768 TFLOPS
409.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
235.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

175W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Polaris 20
GPU Name
Tonga
Polaris 20 XTR (215-0910066)
GPU Variant
Tonga XT GL
GCN 4.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
5 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy