Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 6300 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power

AMD Radeon RX 6300 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon RX 6300 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 6300 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 71% (2040MHz vs 1190MHz)
Lower TDP (32W vs 75W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 6300 +71%
3.133 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
1.828 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Mar 2016
Navi II
Generation
GeForce 900
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
1026 MHz
2040 MHz
Boost Clock
1190 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
32bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
768
48
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
8 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

65.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.08 GPixel/s
97.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.12 GTexel/s
6.267 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.133 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.828 TFLOPS
195.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.12 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x HDMI 2.1
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 24
GPU Name
GM206
Navi 24 XL
GPU Variant
GM206-251-A1
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
6.7
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy