Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View

AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 6900 XT and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2250MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
5080 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 6900 XT +71900%
23.04 TFLOPS
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2020
Release Date
Jan 2009
Navi II
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1825 MHz
Base Clock
-
2250 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
80
Compute Units
2
5120
Shading Units
40
320
TMUs
4
128
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
80
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

288.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
720.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
46.08 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
23.04 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
1440 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
RV620
Navi 21 XTX (215-121000167)
GPU Variant
RV620 PRO (215-0670006)
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
55 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Board Design

300W
TDP
32W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1 2x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
1x VHDCI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.5
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy