Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT vs 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP

AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT vs 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 20GB VRAM Radeon RX 7950 XT and 16MB VRAM Voodoo4 2 4200 AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT 's Advantages
Boost Clock3000MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (800.0GB/s vs 2.288GB/s)
5376 additional rendering cores
3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 300W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Unknown
Navi III
Generation
Voodoo4-2
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 4x

Clock Speeds

2000 MHz
Base Clock
-
3000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2500 MHz
Memory Clock
143 MHz

Memory

20GB
Memory Size
16MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR
320bit
Memory Bus
64bit
800.0GB/s
Bandwidth
2.288GB/s

Render Config

84
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
5376
Shading Units
-
336
TMUs
2
192
ROPs
2
-
-
-
84
RT Cores
-
256 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
-
80 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

576.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
286.0 MPixel/s
1008 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
286.0 MTexel/s
129.0 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
64.51 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
2.016 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

300W
TDP
15W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1a 2x DisplayPort 2.1 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 31
GPU Name
VSA-101
Navi 31 XT+
GPU Variant
Daytona (355-0025-221)
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
Voodoo Scalable
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
180 nm
57.7 billion
Transistors
0.014 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
112 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
6.0
4.6
OpenGL
1.1
2.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy