Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling vs AMD FirePro RG220

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling vs AMD FirePro RG220

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling and 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1677MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
4016 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro RG220 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 345W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling +17075%
13.74 TFLOPS
FirePro RG220
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2017
Release Date
May 2010
Vega
Generation
FirePro RG
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1406 MHz
Base Clock
-
1677 MHz
Boost Clock
-
945 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR3
2048bit
Memory Bus
256bit
483.8GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
1
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
80
256
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

107.3 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
429.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
27.48 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.74 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
858.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

345W
TDP
35W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DMS-59
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
M93
Vega 10 XTX
GPU Variant
-
GCN 5.0
Architecture
TeraScale
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
55 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
0.242 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
73 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy