Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling vs AMD FirePro W600

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling vs AMD FirePro W600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling and 2GB VRAM FirePro W600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1677MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 345W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling +1689%
13.74 TFLOPS
FirePro W600
0.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2017
Release Date
Jun 2012
Vega
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1406 MHz
Base Clock
-
1677 MHz
Boost Clock
-
945 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
2048bit
Memory Bus
128bit
483.8GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
512
256
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

107.3 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
429.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
27.48 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.74 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
858.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
48.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

345W
TDP
75W
700 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
Cape Verde
Vega 10 XTX
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO GL
GCN 5.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy