Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3450

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3450

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 3450 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1677MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3450 's Advantages
Lower TDP (83W vs 345W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2017
Release Date
Jul 2005
Vega
Generation
Quadro FX Curie
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1406 MHz
Base Clock
-
1677 MHz
Boost Clock
-
945 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR3
2048bit
Memory Bus
256bit
483.8GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
-
256
TMUs
12
64
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

107.3 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
429.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.100 GTexel/s
27.48 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.74 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
858.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

345W
TDP
83W
700 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
NV41
Vega 10 XTX
GPU Variant
NV41 GL
GCN 5.0
Architecture
Curie
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
130 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
0.19 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
225 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy