Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL vs AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition

AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL vs AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon RX Vega M GL and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1011MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 174.7GB/s)
Lower TDP (65W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition 's Advantages
768 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX Vega M GL
2.588 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition +43%
3.723 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2018
Release Date
May 2015
Vega
Generation
Crystal System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
IGP
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

931 MHz
Base Clock
-
1011 MHz
Boost Clock
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1365 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
1024bit
Memory Bus
256bit
179.2GB/s
Bandwidth
174.7GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
20
Compute Units
32
1280
Shading Units
2048
80
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

32.35 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.09 GPixel/s
80.88 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
116.4 GTexel/s
2.588 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
3.723 TFLOPS
2.588 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.723 TFLOPS
161.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
232.7 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Polaris 22
GPU Name
Amethyst
VegaM XL (D715A714)
GPU Variant
Amethyst XT
GCN 4.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5 billion
Transistors
5 billion
208 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Board Design

65W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy