Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon RX Vega Nano and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano 's Advantages
Boost Clock1546MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (409.6GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
3880 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (175W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX Vega Nano +2261%
12.66 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Sep 2008
Vega
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1247 MHz
Base Clock
-
1546 MHz
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
896MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR3
2048bit
Memory Bus
448bit
409.6GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
27
4096
Shading Units
216
256
TMUs
72
64
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

98.94 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
395.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
-
-
12.66 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
791.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

175W
TDP
182W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
GT200
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
GCN 5.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
65 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy