Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano vs ATI Radeon HD 3850

AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano vs ATI Radeon HD 3850

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon RX Vega Nano and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 3850 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano 's Advantages
Boost Clock1546MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (409.6GB/s vs 53.12GB/s)
3776 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 3850 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 175W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX Vega Nano +2857%
12.66 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 3850
0.428 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Nov 2007
Vega
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1247 MHz
Base Clock
-
1546 MHz
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
830 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR3
2048bit
Memory Bus
256bit
409.6GB/s
Bandwidth
53.12GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
320
256
TMUs
16
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

98.94 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.69 GPixel/s
395.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.69 GTexel/s
-
-
-
12.66 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
427.5 GFLOPS
791.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
85.50 GFLOPS

Board Design

175W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
RV670
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
GPU Variant
RV670 PRO (215-0708003)
GCN 5.0
Architecture
TeraScale
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
55 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy