Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Sky 500 vs AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM

AMD Radeon Sky 500 vs AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Sky 500 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 250 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Sky 500 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (153.6GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
Lower TDP (65W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Sky 500 +201%
2.432 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 250 OEM
0.806 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Oct 2013
Radeon Sky
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
153.6GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
1280
Shading Units
384
80
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.400 GPixel/s
76.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.432 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
806.4 GFLOPS
152.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
50.40 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
65W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
Oland
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GPU Variant
Oland XT (215-0837000)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy