Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Sky 500 vs AMD Radeon R9 280X

AMD Radeon Sky 500 vs AMD Radeon R9 280X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Sky 500 and 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Sky 500 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon R9 280X 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
Boost Clock1000MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 153.6GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Sky 500
2.432 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 280X +68%
4.096 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Oct 2013
Radeon Sky
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
850 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
153.6GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
1280
Shading Units
2048
80
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
32.00 GPixel/s
76.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.432 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
152.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1024 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
Tahiti
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GPU Variant
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy