Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Sky 500 vs AMD Radeon R9 285

AMD Radeon Sky 500 vs AMD Radeon R9 285

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Sky 500 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 285 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Sky 500 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (150W vs 190W)
AMD Radeon R9 285 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 153.6GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Sky 500
2.432 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 285 +35%
3.29 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Sep 2014
Radeon Sky
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
153.6GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
1280
Shading Units
1792
80
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.38 GPixel/s
76.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
102.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.290 TFLOPS
2.432 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.290 TFLOPS
152.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
205.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
190W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
Tonga
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GPU Variant
Tonga PRO (215-0851128)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
5 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy