Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Sky 500 vs AMD FirePro W600

AMD Radeon Sky 500 vs AMD FirePro W600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Sky 500 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Sky 500 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (153.6GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Sky 500 +216%
2.432 TFLOPS
FirePro W600
0.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Jun 2012
Radeon Sky
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
153.6GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
1280
Shading Units
512
80
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
76.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.432 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
152.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
48.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
Cape Verde
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy