Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Sky 700 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

AMD Radeon Sky 700 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Radeon Sky 700 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Sky 700 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
Lower TDP (90W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Sky 700 +13%
3.226 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 TU106
2.849 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Jun 2020
Radeon Sky
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
1792
Shading Units
896
112
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
100.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
3.226 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
90W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
TU106
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
TU106-125-KAB-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy